A comparative study of direct action in Iranian, Egyptian and French law with a focus on Iranian law

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 MA. Student of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Professor of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Direct action is one of the grounds that legislators protect creditor rights. Following the 2016 amendments to the French Civil Code, direct action, which had long been accepted in French law, was specified in the Civil Code. Direct action does not have a clear legal status in Iranian law, but it has been analyzed by jurists in Egyptian and French law. The purpose of a comparative study of direct action in the first place is to clarify its theoretical aspect in Iranian law to be considered in the amendments to the Iranian Civil Code. Secondly, the practical aspect of this legal institution, as mentioned in Egyptian law, is important. Because the direct-action mechanism can reduce the prolongation of the trial and, consequently, reduce the volume of litigation. Under Iranian law, as in Egyptian and French law, the practical aspect of direct action can be provided by anticipating this legal institution in a lease, tax evasion lawsuits, alimony lawsuits, and other cases that are challenging for the judiciary. This will be an effective shortcut for both the beneficiary and the judiciary.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abu Al Soud, R. (1994). Principles of Obligation, Beirut, Al Dar Ol Jamie. (in Arabic)
Al-Sanhuri, A. (2000). Al Waseet in Explaining the New Civil Code, Beirut, Al-Halabi Al- Huquqia Publications, Vol. 2. (in Arabic)
-------------------. (2012). Theory of Contract, Tehran, Khorsandi, Vol. 2. (in Arabic)
Araghi, S. E. (2017). Labour Law, Tehran, Samt Publication, Vol. 1. (in Persian)
Bayat, F. & Bayat, SH. (2017). The Comprehensive Commentary on the Civil Code, Tehran, Arshad. (in Persian)
Buffelan-Lanore, Y. & Larribau-Terneyre, V. (2010). Droit civil–Les obligations, 12e, Paris, Sirey.
Cabrillac, R. (2016). Droit des obligations, 12e, Paris, Dalloz.
Cooke, J. (2009). Law of Tort, 9th, Harlow, Pearson Education.
Emami, S. H. (2018). Civil Law, Tehran, Eslamie, Vol. 1. (in Persian)
Eskini, R. (2015). Commercial Law Trading Corporations, Tehran, Samt Publication, Vol. 3. (in Persian)
Flour, J., Aubert, J. L., & Savaux, É. (2015). Droit civil. Les obligations, Vol. 3,  Le rapport d'obligation, 9e, Paris, Sirey.
Henry, X., Venandet, G., Wiederkehr, G., Jacob, F., & Tisserand-Martin, A. (2005). Code civil, 104e, Paris, Dalloz.
Katouzian, N. (2016). General Principles of Contract, Tehran, Enteshar Publication, Vol. 3. (in Persian)
----------------. (2019). General Theory of Obligations, Tehran, Mizan. (in Persian)
-----------------. (2019). The validity of the judgment in a civil lawsuit, Theran, Mizan. (in Persian)
Saad, N. E. (1998). General Theory of Obligation, Beirut, Dar Ol Nehzat Al Arbia, Vol. 2. (in Arabic)
Shahidi, M. (2019). Civil Law-3, Theran, Majd. (in Persian)
Shams, A. (2016). Civil Procedure, Advanced course, Tehran, Derack, Vol. 1. (in Persian)
-------------. (2017). Civil Procedure, Advanced course, Tehran, Derack, Vol. 2. (in Persian)
Shoarian, E. & Torabi, E. (2016). The Law of Obligation, Tehran, S.D.I.L. (in Persian)
Starck, B., Roland, H., & Boyer, L. (1989). Droit civil. Obligations, Vol. 3, régime general (3e), France, Paris, Litec.
Sultan, A. (1974). Principles of Obligation, Beirut, Dar Ol Nehzat Al Arbia. (in Arabic)
Terré, F., Simler, P., & Lequette, Y. (2005). Droit civil. Les obligations, 9e, Paris, Dalloz.
Weill, A. & Terré, F. (1980). Droit civil. Les obligations (3e), Paris, Dalloz.
Websites           
https://www.dalloz-actualite.fr/flash/loi-applicable-l-action-directe-en-matiere-non-contractuelle-contre-un-assureur.
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000031150080.
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000039692118.