Viewpoints of thought and Foundation of civil liability of imposing sanction

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of private law, Faculty of law and political science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Continuity of imposing sanctions against Iran and its harmful effects on natural and legal person has brought up the necessity to determine of the scope of liability due to imposing sanctions. Clarifying this issue requires examining the viewpoints of thought governing the limits of the legitimacy of sanctions and then determining the scope of civil liability due to imposing of illegitimate sanctions in domestic and international law. The present research which was written with analytical-descriptive method and using library tools, clarifies foundations of civil responsibility due to imposing sanctions in domestic and international law. Regarding the conceptual difference of civil liability foundations in domestic law and international law, civil liability due to imposing of sanctions in domestic law is subject to the theory of fault and in international law is subject to the theory of risk, but both domestic and international systems have this common point that they consider the act of violation of international law as an objective element, regardless of whether that act is intentional or unintentional. In this way, the imposition of sanctions that enforce or effect it violate international law, will causes responsibility of the sanctioning authority.

Keywords

References

ابراهیم‏گل، علی‌رضا (1398). مسئولیت بین‏المللی دولت: متن و شرح مواد کمیسیون حقوق بین‏الملل. چ 11. تهران: مؤسسة مطالعات و پژوهش‏‏های حقوقی شهر دانش.
بادینی، حسن (1383). هدف مسئولیت مدنی. مجلة دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، ش 66.
حسینی‏نژاد، حسین‌قلی (1370). مسئولیت مدنی. تهران: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی شهید بهشتی.
جنیدی، لعیا و راضی، سپیده (1401). نگاهی انتقادی به عملکرد تقنینی ایران در مورد مسئولیت مدنی دولت خارجی در اعمال تحریم. پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، د 11، ش 41.
صفایی، حسین و رحیمی، حبیب‌الله (1399). مسئولیت مدنی تطبیقی. چ 2. شهر دانش.
ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا (1386). حقوق بین‏الملل عمومی. چ 30. تهران: کتابخانة گنج‌ دانش.
ضیایی، یاسر و روحانی، زهراسادات (1399). پیامدهای حقوقی مسئولیت بین‏المللی دولت در رویة دیوان بین‏المللی دادگستری در پرتو طرح مسئولیت بین‏المللی دولت مورخ 2001. دیدگاه‏های حقوق قضایی، د 25، ش 92.
قاسم‌زاده، مرتضی (1388). الزام‏ها و مسئولیت مدنی بدون قرارداد. چ 8. تهران: میزان.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1400). الزام‏های خارج از قرارداد مسئولیت مدنی. چ 3. تهران: گنج دانش. جلد اول: قواعد عمومی.
ممتاز، جمشید، تحریم اقتصادی و حقوق بین­الملل عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، شماره 22، 1360
وکیل، امیرساعد (1390). ضمانت اجرای حقوق بنیادین بشر. بنیاد حقوقی میزان.
Ebrahim-Gol, A. (2018). Responsibility of states for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries. 11th edition. Tehran: Shahre Danesh Institute of Law Research and Studies. (In Persian)
Badini, H. (2004). Purpose of civil responsibility. Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, No. 66. (In Persian)
Besson, S. (2022). Theories of International Responsibility Law. Cambridge University Press.
Bloomfield, L. & Egypt, M. (2017). Israel, and the Gulf of Aqaba in International Law, Carswell, 1957. published online by Cambridge University Press.
Borchard, E. M. (1929). Theoretical Aspects of the International Responsibility of States. Yale University.
Bailey, T. A. (1934). the United States and the Blacklist during the Great War. The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 6, No. 1.
Coulon, C., Demogue, R. (2006). le droit de la responsabilité civile. Revue interdisciplinaire d'études juridiques, Vol. 56.
Davis, L. & Engerman, S. (2003). Sanctions: Neither War nor Peace. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 17, No. 2.
Dupuy, P-M. (1992). Dionisio Anzilotti, the Law of International Responsibility of States, EJIL.
Dubin, A. S. (1979). A Journey through the Antiboycott Laws, Tulsa Law Review, Vol. 14.
Demogue, R. (1923). Traité des obligations en général. Publisher Rousseau. Vol. 1. n 277.
Folch, A.E. (2010). Economic Sanctions and the Duration of Civil Conflicts. Journal of Peace Research.
Fournier S., P. Maistre du Chambon (2015). La responsabilité civile délictuelle. 4e edition. Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
Hosseini-Nejad, H. (1991). Civil Responsibility. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti Academic Jihad Publications. (In Persian)
Kolb, R. (2017). The International law of State responsibility. Edward Elgar publishing.
Nokkala. E. (2021). He Development of the Law of Nations: Wolff and Vattel. Cambridge University Press.
Neff, S. (1998). Economic Warfare in Contemporary International Law: Three Schools of Thought, Evaluated according to an historical method. Stanford Journal of International Law.
Oppenheim, L. (2012). International Law: A Treatise. Vol. 1. Peace. London, New York: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1905, Electronic version.
Ouedraogo, A. (2008). Évolution du concept de faute dan la Théorie de la responsabilité Internationale des États, 21.2 Revue québécoise de droit international.
Katouzian, N. (2021). Obligations outside the contract of civil liability. Third edition. Ganj Danesh Publications. First volume: general rules. (In Persian)
Pellet, A., Crawford, J., & Olleson, S. (2010). The Law of International Responsibility. Chpter 1. Oxford University Press.
Pisillo-Mazzeschi (1992). Riccardo the Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of the International Responsibility of States, 35 GermanYBIntlL 9.
Sheridan, P. F. (1995). Study of Civil Liability Systems for Remedying Environmental Damage, CMS Cameron McKenna.
Sucharitkul Sompong (1996). State Responsibility and International Liability under International Law, 18 Loyola of Los Angeles Int'l. & Comp. L.J. 821, GGU Law Digital Commons.
Safai, H. & Rahimi, H. (2019). Comparative Civil Liability. Second edition. Shahrdanesh. (In Persian)
Schreiber, A. P. (1973). Economic Coercion as an Instrument of Foreign Policy: U.S. Economic Measures against Cuba and the Dominican Republic, Vol. 25, No. 3.
Thomas A. R. & Duncan, J. C. (2017). The Law of Neutrality. International Law Studies, Vol. 78, Electronic version.
Tribolo, J. (2017). “La théorie de la fonction promotionnelle du droit de Norberto Bobbio: contribution au débat sur la juridicité du droit international”, Revue de la Recherche Juridique - Droit prospectif, Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille.
Terré. F. et al. (2018). Droit Civil, les obligation. 12e éd. Dalloz, no1051.
Verhoeven, J. (2000). Charles de Visscher: Living and Thinking International Law. EJIL, Vol. 11, No. 4.
Vattel, E. (2008). The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, with Three Early Essays on the Origin and Nature of Natural Law and on Luxury, Liberty Fund.
Vkil, A. (2011). Guarantee of implementation of fundamental human rights. Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian)
Ziai Begdali, M. (2006). Public International Law. 30th edition. Tehran: Ganj Danesh Library. (In Persian)
Ziyaei, Y. & Rouhani, Z. (2019). Legal Consequences of the International Responsibility of the State in the Procedure of the International Court of Justice in the Light of the Draft of Responsibility of states for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001. Scientific Quarterly of Judicial Law Perspectives, Vol. 25, No. 92. (In Persian)
Documents and Cases
Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts of 2001.
Draft articles on the responsibility of international organizations of 2011.
Draft articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities, 2001 and Draftprinciples on the allocation of loss in the case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities, 2006.
Security Council resolution 562 (1985) [Nicaragua-USA], 10 May 1985
Resolutions of responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts: Resolution 56/83 of 12 December 2001, the annex to which contains the text of the articles on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts, resolutions 59/35 of 2 December 2004, 62/61 of 6 December 2007 and 65/19 of 6 December 2010 commending the articles to the attention of Governments, Eventually Resolution 68/104 adopted by the General Assembly on 16 December 2013.
Resolutions of Responsibility of international organizations: Resolution 66/100 of 9 December 2011, the annex to which contains the text of the articles on the responsibility of international organizations, and its resolutions 69/126 of 10 December 2014 and 72/122 of 7 December 2017 commending the articles to the attention of Governments and international organizations, Eventually Resolution 75/143 adopted by the General Assembly on 15 December 2020.
Case Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2012,
Case Nicaragua v. United States, ICJ Judgment of 27 June 1986.
https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/70/070-19860627-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
Case GabCikovo-Nagymaros, Hungary/ Slovakia. 25 September 1997, Para.150.
Case Barcelona Traction, light and power company, limited (Belgium v. Spain), ICJ. Reports, Judgment of 5 February 1970, para. 32.
Private Law
Volume 20, Issue 2
Autumn & Winter
October 2023
Pages 227-241

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics