نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق خصوصی، گروه حقوق، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه حقوق، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.
3 استادیار، گروه حقوق ، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان رشت, ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
With the development of communication and media tools, defamation cases have gone beyond national borders, so the international elements involved in such cases can be very numerous. Therefore, the legal systems should provide choice of laws rule for the courts that have a appropriate effect. In this research, it will be investigated that what kind of rules are used in the legal systems of England, the European Union and Iran to determine applicable law. Are these rules complying with the conditions of defamation claims? In the studied legal systems, no special rule has been designed for defamation. In the European Union, due to the Exception of defamation from the general rules of conflict of laws, national rules are applied. In Iranian law, only the general rule of lex fori will be applicable, but in English law, according to common law, defamation must be held liable by both the lex fori and the lex loci delicti. In this research, it will be shown that the rules provided in these legal systems are ineffective and have to conform with defamation lawsuits.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
