حبیبا، سعید و بهادری جهرمی، زهرا (1396). مطالعة تطبیقی شیوة تدوین قوانین و تأثیر آن بر فرایند ثبت اختراع (مطالعة موردی یک اختراع ثبت‌شده در ایران و امریکا). مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، 8(2)، 565 ـ 581.
صادقی، محمود و امینی، مهدی (1391). موجبات و آثار ابطال گواهینامة حق اختراع. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، 3(1)، 55 ـ 72. 10. 2059/jcl.2012.32105
عبداللهی، محمدجواد و شریفی رنانی، مریم (1399). شرط عدم چالش اعتبار گواهی حق اختراع در قرارداد لیسانس.
حقوق خصوصی، 17(1)، 205 ـ 229
. 10.22059/jolt.2020.296771.1006818
غمامی، مجید (1401). اعتبار امر قضاوت‌شده در فرجام. نقد و تحلیل آرای قضایی، 1(2)، 389 ـ 402. 10. 2034/analysis.2023.701516
Abdollahi, M.J. & Sharifi Renani, M. (2020). No-Challenge Validity Clause in Patents License Agreements. Private Law, 17(1), DOI: 10.22059/jolt.2020.296771.1006818. (in Persian)
Anloot, T. (2023). Undefined ground: Form or Substance in PTO Estoppel. The University of Chicago Review, 90(8), 20174-2210.
Contreras, J. L. (2015). A Market Reliance Theory for FRAND Commitments and Other Patent Pledges. Utah Law Review, 2015(2).
Court for the District of Delaware. (n.d). https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/opinions/17-1405_1.pdf.
Esch, J. & Miller, P. (2019). Petitioner Estoppel from Patent Trial and Appeal Board Proceedings after SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu. Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 18(2), 9-22.
Ghamami, M. (2022). The Validity of Res Judicata in the Appellate Stage. Analysis of Judicial Decisions Journal, 1(2), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.22034/analysis.2023.701516.
Habiba, S. & Bahadori Jehrami, Z. (2017). Comparative Study of the Methodology of Lawmaking and Its Impact on the Patent Registration Process: A Case Study of a Patent Registered in Iran and the U.S. Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 8(2), 565-581.
Harrison, J. C. (2019). A Recent Patent Class on the Scope of IPR Estoppel at the PTAB. Journal of Business & Technology Law, 14(1), 34-48.
Kehoe, W. (2024). Burdening the Skilled Searcher: The Federal Circuit Falls Short of Providing Ironclad Fixes to § 315(e) Estoppel Issues in Iron burg v. Valve. Villanova Law Review, 69(3), 575-614.
Laser, C. H. J. (2019). The Scope of IPR Estoppel: A Statutory, Historical, and Normative Analysis. Florida Law Review, 70(6), 1127-1182.
----------------. (2022). Brief of Patent Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=fac_briefs.
Modderman, M. (2020). Inter Partes Review Estoppel: Restoring The Principles Of Res Judicata. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3531340 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3531340.
Motl, A. (2015). Inter Partes Review: Ensuring Effective Patent Litigation Through Estoppel. Minnesota Law Review, 99(1975).
PTAB Bar Association (2024). Bench and Bar Discussion of IPR Strategies and Practical Tips. https://www.ptabbar.org/docs/PTAB_Webinar_PowerPoint-Practical_Tips_for_IPR.pdf.
Rueckheim, M. & Jung, R. (2024). The Evolving Scope of IPR Estoppel as Applied to System and Product Prior Art. Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 23(2), 138-144.
Sadeghi, M. & Amini, M. (2012). Causes and Effects of Annulment of Patent Certificates. Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 3(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcl.2012.32105
Seymore, S. (2023). Patent Forfeiture. Duke Law Journal, 72(1019), 1019-1078.
Supreme Court of the United States. (n.d). https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-440/170364/20210301121225896_20-440%20Amicus%20Curiae%20Brief.pdf.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (n.d). https://cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/20-1098.OPINION.11-10-2020_1683113.pdf.
United States Patent and Trademarks Office. (n.d). The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/aia_implementation/120321-mcaa_conf.pdf.
Zirpoli, Ch. T. & Hickey, K. J. (2024). The Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Inter Partes Review. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R48016.
